School trips

School trips are the worst, especially when you're obligated to go and therefore have to cough up money, without you getting the option to say "no".

School trips can be fun, but the truth is that they stopped being fun a long time time ago. Not everyone might consider it "fun", has the money, or has the time; especially when you're going on trips like camping, where you stay away from home multiple days.
This mainly concerns college, where most students have a job they have to attend right after school. And especially in college most schools don't bother to take care of any transportation; you'll just have to figure out how to get there. At least that's the case here.

What's worse is when everyone in your class is looking forward to it, except you. It makes you look like a grumpy senile man, because you end up being the only one who doesn't want to go. Since the rest does, that means the trip must be fun and you just don't like fun, right?

2012

Alot of people think we're all going to die in 2012; that countless disasters will hit the Earth and the end of humankind will come. Many American teenagers wrote letters about being scared and killed themselves afterwards.
And I'm sorry to say: "GOOD RIDDANCE TO YOU."

Do you honestly believe a prediction done by an acient tribe is true? The same tribe who sacrificed women and children to make it rain?

It isn't the first time the end of the world was "predicted" and as you can see, we are still here.
If you're being a dumbass then you're only making life harder on yourself.

Dane Cook

What a terrible, unfunny piece of lowlife he is.

For people who are not familiar with his name, I salute you, and lower my hand right away to tell you that Dane Cockface is an overrated comedian. Though alot of people, generally Americans, seem to like his acts and many use soundbites from his shows to make "funny" Youtube videos with. Though those videos fail just as hard as the show the sound was taken from.

I honestly tried to like him since alot of people praise his work, though watching his shows only made me wonder how big the space in the heads of his fans is. He wasn't able to make me laugh or giggle even once.
That the man lacks talent isn't even the biggest issue; but that he has such a big audience and gets to perform in enormous theatres is. I don't understand that.

This is my opinion, but feel free to look at a piece and be the judge yourself:

Skunks

If there's something I can't stand, it are these false facts about skunks.
So far the movie "Over The Hedge" is the only movie where other creatures were able to stand around a skunk without running away in absolute horror.

In case you're an ignorant idiot: skunks don't reek all the time and only use their "smell" when they are scared.
And even then it's not something they commonly use; when a skunk gets cornered by a possible threat it stomps with its front paws on the ground. If the threat doesn't leave only then it sprays.

Pepe Le Pew and similar characters are not setting a good example, since in most cartoons people seem to smell them from miles away. Unless Pepe Le Pew is scared to shit every second of the day, this is nonsense.

Do you wonder why I should care about any of this? After all, Pepe Le Pew is a terrific character and his cartoons are just as fun.
I care because I used to have skunks myself. And the conclusion people make out of others who keep skunks is that the skunks smell, your house smells and that you smell. People don't know anything about these creatures than that they supposedly have this odour that never leaves, all thanks to the neverending running gag about skunks in cartoons and movies.
It is one of the few television running gags where people actually believe it's true. It's creates a bad name for skunks they don't deserve.

Increasing cartoon violence

Here's some news: it isn't increasing, only decreasing because people have the need to complain so much about today's cartoons and its "extreme" images and sound effects.

It's strange, since old cartoons like Tom and Jerry and the past Disney/Warner Brothers cartoons weren't that innocent either; racial jokes, portraying weapons and the use of them, and what is more fun than your favourite cartoon character going out to hunt an animal for no apparent reason? Get that moose, Mickey.
Most people don't even approve of hunting (for fun), yet you didn't hear them complain back then, but in this age people seem to do nothing else. It's their hobby to make a big deal out of everything.

Not to mention that the show Animaniacs is filled with adult humor itself, and even after people discovered so, it stayed silent.
Though when someone dares to create a cartoon with either one of the typical features the old cartoons used to have on this day and age, it's suddenly "bad for the children". That's because the violence in old cartoons is not called "cartoon violence", but "comic relief", and why start bashing a cartoon older than you after so many years anyway, right?

The reason why parents think Ben10 is worse than Tom and Jerry is because the general description of Ben10 is "A boy who can turn into aliens fights crime and other aliens, ACTION YEAH!", while Tom and Jerry's description says "A cat trying to catch a mouse.", even though what they mean is "A cat who tries to brutally murder a mouse, but the mouse always wins the blood fest".
The series Pokémon isn't even allowed to show guns, though a gunshaped limb on a Pokémon that shoots objects similar to bullets is alright. And for some reason, people who push their pets to fight each other to the death is fine, too.

I once saw a Mickey Mouse cartoon where Mickey grabbed an enormous rifle and started shooting like a maniac because he thought there was a burglar in his house. Who decided guns can't be portrayed now all of the sudden? Yes, these past cartoons weren't really made for children, in fact, they were made for adults, but that doesn't take away the fact that children didn't get to see them. Eventually. Even now children get to see them because it belongs to "culture", yet mommy and daddy don't like it when Junior is watching Ben10 and Spongebob.

It all has to do with time.
All the violent, yet ignored and appreciated cartoons come from an age where these jokes were normal and cartoons respected, whatever the subject was. But as time progressed people started questioning things, and in the end no one is allowed to do anything.
And in this new age, where people are fully aware they're being chained down by society and are not allowed to have any freedom of speech, new cartoons arise, and they're childish and dull because of going through too many "I-c-what-u-did-thar"-filters.

I'll pick the movie "All Dogs Go To Heaven" as an example.
There are two movies and a tv series, and the first movie had it all; criminality, gambling, drinking, lust, murder, and Hell, yet parents already started complaining about this one when it came out. While it is considered a classic to the rest of the world.

The second movie is "nice", and that describes it all. The main character was just the empty shell of the person he once was, and the story comes nowhere near the first; this is a true childrens' flick. The series has the same tone.

You can say that because the first movie got criticized on its themes, they took the opportunity to alter the second movie. I don't think the original creator had any say in this, otherwise he basicly sold his soul to 4Kids.
If there is something you'll have to keep in mind it's that you don't always have to give those few people who're complaining, because that's exactly why everyone complains so much now and why there are Muslim extremists in the world winning the media battles. They're just 3 guys with a computer and a phone, people.

That's all, folks!

Bagpipes in cartoons

I watched quite an awkward cartoon this morning, it was about this redhaired boy with glasses who changes into someone or something else every day.
I think it was called "Martin Morning". Fitting.

Today's episode involved him turning into a Scotsman, so he woke up with a skirt and a fancy matching hat. Great, now all the children watching will assume all the Scottish wear a skirt and that every man who wears a skirt is Scottish.
Though that wasn't the worst part, the worst part was that Martin and his obsessed fan/friend were mocking the skirt.

Next to the fact that no one in Scotland walks around like that in daily life, it greatly annoys me that so many cartoons bring up the stereotype and bash their (old) cultural habits. Not to mention the old bagpipe-joke many cartoons seem to bring up; when a character wants to annoy another character he/she always grabs some bagpipes and starts playing a semi-catchy tune for everyone to enjoy.
What is this hate towards bagpipes? It's a beautiful instrument, but if you can't play it properly then of course it sounds bad. That's the case with every instrument.

And since when is a skirt "not manly"? Many men wore a skirt in the past. What about the indians, vikings and not to mention the pope, who wears an entire dress and still dares to say homosexuality is bad. That's funny.
What's also funny is the fact that there has never been a single Scot who complained about this unfair treatment in the television world, a whole lot different than religion, a group who has the need to complain about everything.

Cartoons are meant to be funny, and I'm not saying that ridiculing something can't be funny, but it's time for some new jokes. Lay off the bagpipes, it never made anyone laugh.

Michael Jackson

The guy made good music. So? Since when is talent a ticket to freedom from a courtroom?

I think it's only curious that so many children claimed to be abused by him. Alot of people say the families were out for Jackson's money, but this all doesn't take away the fact that Mr. Jackson was a disturbed and messed up figure.
I wouldn't already appreciate a fullgrown man lying in bed with my child, drinking Jesus juice. Wether he did "the naughty thing" or not.

The problem with Michael and the rest of America is that they all blame it to his parents, especially his father and think his past abuse is a good excuse for Michael to be acting like a total nutjob, "because he only wanted to be a child again, since he didn't have the opportunity back then, ect".
There are alot of abused children in the world and they didn't turn out half as crazy like he did.

Michael always said he loved dancing and singing, and since he got tons of money with doing something what he liked I don't see the reason to think your life is still incomplete. He got everything he ever wanted, even a new skin. Did we really try to learn to "just run away from a fight" and to "respect each other and yourself" from a man with such an incredible low self esteem?
He looked like a zombie, and you can't convince me that Michael was blind for his own hideous appearance. He had all the time to stop this makeover-madness. He killed himself and I am certain of that.

Yet what really angers me is how the media scolded him for being a pedofile just the day before and later reacted to his death with great "sorrow".
Really, choose a side or shut up, it's not that hard.

Of course after his death alot of people were quite busy making beautiful tributes. Too bad all of them were with pictures of Michael from a zillion years ago; since even the fans know he destroyed his own face and was no tribute material. But how much of a fan are you if you're not able to acknowledge the real Michael and just keep living in your own world? A very good fan, but not a very good individual.

It's clear that someone has to die first to get respect. Just look at Elvis Presley; he was a fat, wife-beating bastard, but when he died there was no way people brought up all the bad stuff he did or the fact how unappealing he looked. They showed nothing else but the nice pictures from the past, where he was still young and slender.

And that's what happened right after Michael's death, too.
Again people, pick a side and stick to it, otherwise get lost. Everyone's a hypocrite.

People who don't know Disney

My mother and I went out to buy some new pants a few months ago. When we arrived at the cash register, the cashier said we could pick out four keychains since we spent a certain amount of money; we had the choice between three different Cars-themed keychains and three different Disney Princesses-themed keychains. Well, since my brother's birthday was coming up, we chose three Cars keychains for him and one with a Disney princess for my little sister.

Since the one with Cinderella and Snowwhite looked like puke, I told her to "give me Jasmine".
On which the cashier replied: "Eh, who is Jasmine?".

It's not an obligation to know all the characters' names from every Disney movie ever created, but concerning her young age you'd think she would know something about the classics.
I myself am a begin 90's child, so I was raised with all the Disney movies made in that year and all the years before. Lets say she simply never saw the movie Aladdin; was this girl seriously that clueless that she didn't even know who Cinderella and Snowwhite were and that way couldn't determine that the last keychain left would have to be "this Jasmine" I was asking for?
People don't seem to care about animated movies or cartoons in this age.

South Park: the 200th episode

After 11 whole seasons, and the 12th season about to be completed, has South Park finally crossed the line?
After all these episodes that included sex, drugs, abuse, torture, diseases, prejudges, swears and making fun of almost every actor, singer and common human, have they managed to create an episode so shocking that 70% had to be cencored and bleeped out and later on banished from the screen?
No.

Episode 200 and 201; I was never able to check these "feared" episodes out for myself, since it never aired here and the South Park site has no longer the given permission to show them online, even though I wonder how long these episodes actually were online.
Well, are these episodes that awful and "feared"? Ha ha. Of course not. Yet one Muslim extremist thought he was being helpful by telling the creators they'll probably end up like Theo van Gogh: stabbed multiple times by a rabid Muslim and with a nice finishing touch, a knife jabbed into his gut with a subtile letter onto it, just because Theo wanted to make a movie about the female suppression in the Islam.
And as a second friendly warning he published the home- and working address of our Matt and Trey on the internet. On a Muslim extremists website.

Am I the only one who realises that this warning is a failed, covered-up threat and good enough to pull this nut out of his hole and give him a chance in hell to escape jail?


This entire commotion was caused because the creators showed Mohammed the prophet in these episodes, and so far I know in a bear costume most of the time.
Are you threatening two men with a horrible death just because of that? The people in America (and not only America) already look down to Muslims and causing such media attention just because of a cartoon, where the characters actually appreciate Mohammed, is incredibly sad. South Park has always been known to mock someone or something. They even mocked their own religion, Muslims shouldn't act as if they're a holy exception. And as long you're staying in a country you are a guest in, you shouldn't complain so much.
Leave your beliefs at home or stay in your ruined country.

A funny fact is that the creators showed Mohammed in an earlier episode (season 5, for Pete's sake) and there were no complaints then. How does that work?
War will come if you can't laugh about yourself. If you can't handle it, sod off to your own piss-poor country.
That's the way it works.

Nice to know Muslim extremists are loyal South Park watchers, though. How else could they've spotted this "incident" this soon?

Religion: Christianity

When a baby is born, it are the parents and its surroundings who teach it to follow (and fear) a god. Leave the child alone and it'll naturally stay Atheist.

After I drew and published a comic showing an obnoxious Christian and my character having a conversation with "God", this was one of the many comments I recieved:

I'm gonna pray for you guys. Ya'll need it.

If you guys read the Bible and try to understand what He has done for you by letting Christ die for your sins and giving you a chance to go to Heaven, you'll see how God is NOT like what you described at all. God loves you guys. If He didn't, he wouldn't have given us this chance. Like a parent, God might seem like saying to you "don't do this" and don't care about what you desire, but He's only saying that because He know it isn't for ya'll and could harm you. You may think us Christians are "ruining your fun" but understand that the sins or wrongdoings you guys and everyone does are harmful to you not only physically but mentally as well. (Remember, us Christians used to be non-believers ourselves and enjoyed our sins and didn't accept God like you guys until we came to understand the Gospel.)

I don't know if I, a Christian, or other Christians or God for that matter will get through you guys, but really it's up to you guys. God will let you choose either to accept Him or reject Him (even though it will break His heart).Your destiny to go to Heaven and live eternally or go to Hell and lose your soul is in your hands. If you decide to reject God and Christ, oh well; your loss.

John 3:16 "For God so LOVED THE WORLD, that he gave his only begotten son, that whoever believes in him shall not perish but have ever lasting life."

If God truly loves His "children", He will accept them for who they are and not punish them for what they are not.
According to Christians God gave every humanbeing a free will; wouldn't it be hypocrite to punish people because they use it? Yes, it would.

If you want your creations to shut up and jump off a bridge when you tell them to, giving them the freedom to think wasn't really a smart decision when creating them, now was it.

Hey, a parent would punish his or her kids for doing wrong, but that doesn't mean they don't love their kids. They punish their kids as discipline to teach them what's wrong and what's right. It's the same way with God and us. You think the sins you do is just the way you are? No it's not. Your identity is much more than that. You identify yourself with the sins you do.

Besides, a child can choose whether to obey his or her parents by not doing the wrong thing or not, but that's no excuse for avoiding punishment. A criminal has the choice to steal or not, but if he uses that free will to steal, he's still gonna get punish. It's HOW you use your free will that counts. In life, you can't expect that you can do whatever you want and say that action is always right. That's unrealistic.

People sin all the time, but there are those who decide that they want to stop sinning and become a better person because they know what they do is wrong and those who decide they should continue sinning because either they enjoy it or because "it's just the way they are." Without realizing you faults in your sins and choosing to stop those sins, the sins you do will only hurt you and those around you. But mostly you.

There is no way a person would love his/her father or mother when beaten with a whip and that's exactly what Hell represents. Maybe it will cause the child to listen, but will not respect his parents. Only fear them.
I refuse to live my life in fear, including the thought that I can't think what I want or wipe my ass without someone watching and judging me. You'll have to realize that.

Back in the days people used to believe that a child gets born with sins and even that being born is a sin alone. Everything is suddenly a sin, unless you murder or scold others in the name of your Father.
Only dogs are allowed to piss against legs, because apparently animals can't sin. Yet I don't understand why humans can't be seen as "animals"; is it just because we think, fantasize and wear fancy shoes and pants?

I don't see God.
I don't feel God.
If there is someone who loves me, it is my good mother. My true creator. And I have nice, disturbing pictures to prove that she is. I just can't love someone or something who does not show any signs of love back and it doesn't do it for me when "His loyal mind slaves" approach me and claim that He does. It's only logical you want to hear it from the horse's mouth.
Unless the horse is a lie.

I believed; I sang songs about God and all what He did and I prayed.
But talking to a wall is a waste of my time and a waste of my life, I'd rather do the boogie with the devils in Hell than float around through the clouds aimlessly in Heaven for all eternity. Am I sinning by being an Atheist? Yet I'm having a terrific life, unlike my mother who had religious parents who beat the crap out of the poor woman just because she was an unwanted child. These monsters were the good followers of God; and you'll see that they'll change their ways right before they die and expect to be forgiven by Him.
No.
Just no.

If believing in a higher power makes you feel save, you shouldn't listen to my words. Yet you'll have to understand that I am living the exact same life as you do, but with more hours to spend on myself and knowing true peace; without anyone watching your every move.
That is also why I think that Atheists, if anyone, are the true followers of the thing religous people created, "God". Peace in your soul and your acts are without the expectation that you'll get rewarded or punished.

A small tip for Christians:
When you're talking to someone who doesn't believe or has a different religion: Don't quote pieces from the Bible, it's really annoying and it doesn't say them anything.

Alot of Christians claim that all the Christians who are psychotic, violent and child abusers aren't true Christians. Then how many "true" Christians are there?

Here's another nice story:
My mother once lived in an extremely religious town, where she saw a father calling his 4 year old son to cross the street, while the streets were crowded with cars. Since the man pretty much lost his temper and kept yelling at the child, the boy started crossing the road and was crushed by a car right away. Looking at the destroyed corpse of his son the dog simply said "It's God's will" and he lived happily ever after.

And something I still remember from the news:
A man jumped in a tiger cage at a Zoo and yelled "IF GOD EXISTS HE WILL SAVE ME FROM DEATH". Guess what happened.

It's easy to say for Christians that everything people disapprove about them is done by people who aren't actually Christian, but I can't keep help to think that those people are the real Christians.

Another thing I really hate when I get into a discussion with these pigs is when they claim I have certain beliefs just because I don't believe. As if every Atheist has a standard package of "This-is-what-I-think's".
According to them I assume the entire world popped out of nowhere. Well, the same with God, though He apparently needed 6 days more (That's a week, what a coincidence, too bad things like "weeks" and "months" didn't even exist in the beginning of time). And how is "God did it" more logical than proven facts, logic or science?

Another common excuse people use to prove His nonexistent existance is the overused "But you can't see air, though you know that exists!".
I can feel air.
The wind blows, it's air. It's what I breathe.
I can see air.
The wind blows, leaves move, it's air.

I'd like a better example than what Dee Dee once said in Dexter's Laboratory.

God leaves no actual signs whatsoever. Only humans, creatures who are greatly capable of lying and making up beautiful stories, tell me it is true. Air is still something you can identify. I need more than a storybook from thousands of years back that came from a time where all different kinds of fairy tales hit the Earth. So far I'm concerned, I'm not stupid for asking God's attention by approaching me to either one of my senses:
If God gave us the ability to see, hear, smell and feel, it's pretty stupid of the guy to keep Himself invisible for all those senses.

Of course I could've expected that the person who started approaching me is member of some Rapture Ready website, where they even have forum subjects like "how to convert someone" and hold conversations about how "bad" you feel for someone who doesn't believe. A decent Christian would've laughed about my comic. And wouldn't join an ass forum like that to begin with.
These people shouldn't act as if they are right and stop "feeling sorry" for people who have a happy, Godless life. Their place in wannabe-Heaven isn't reserved for them when they force their beliefs on people or when they claim to have prayed for someone. Nobody asked them to and hypocrisy isn't welcome:
They've called Atheists stubborn and agressive, yet they throw around sentences like, and I quote: "I want those nonbelievers to know that us Christians aren't push-overs and never stop fighting." (Click here for the original thread)

I would've laughed if this wasn't serious.
"Aren't push-overs" and "never stop fighting" are both incredibly controversial and the opposite of what both words mean. People greatly disappoint me when they think that every problem in life can be solved with just sitting on your ass and praying. If they think they can make their dreams come true by just folding their hands, they'll not come far.

Or instead of forcing people, how about leaving all God's creations alone and giving them their own freedom to think. Don't like what those Atheists are doing? That's not very polite towards your Father, the one who also made them, now is it. Do you have complaints? Then you're doubting God. No Heaven for you.

It's time for common sense.

Yoai, slash and gay cartoon porn

It's getting hard for me to accept yaoi/yuri fanart, the fans and the artists. I know so many people who are into it, but I find myself pressured to be nice towards them. I do believe that a decent person is a decent person, but I'm just so unflattered by (child)porn artists.

And sadly enough, when it concerns a homosexual relationship portrayed in a piece of artwork, a little too often we see pants being dropped than anything else.

"Yaoi" is meaningless, random gay porn, usually with anime characters (or Western cartoon characters turned into anime/manga).
"Slash" is "boy-on-boy love", but really, "love" is hardly relevant here, there's no real difference between that and yaoi.
For some reason it is an accepted kind of soft porn in society, and 12 year old girls are drawing it, while other artists on the internet feed them the bullshit that it's totally fine for them to do. I don't think it's okey to support young teenagers and their already growing fetish.
For Pete's sake, I drew dragons and the Powerpuff Girls at that age.

The fanfictions are aimed for the characters to end up fucking each other in the ass; and after this brilliant plot, there is not much different that follows after. The drawings are meaningless and random, the stories are empty and dumb.
The fact no one takes or designs their own homosexual character and turns him straight for the sake of the story says alot; for some reason it's only sexy and cool to be homosexual, whether the character actually is or not.
For example, I'm pretty sure no one changed Jakotsu's (from Inuyasha) sexual preference; that boy is allowed to stay his boy-loving self, because it's not about writing a different or original story to these artists, it's just about turning them gay for their own sexual pleasure. Turning straight characters homosexual isn't different or original to begin with, especially not at this point in time.

I'm tired of the excuse that these young cartoon characters are able to go into any direction when getting older, "because they're still young and o-so clueless". It's a cheap excuse and it's hardly sound logic. How can every child in existence turn out gay?
It would be more honest for slash artists to admit they know pretty damn well they're making masturbation art, otherwise they'd use the character's original age, instead of turning them 18 and playing it save.
But of course, enough artists keep the age intact, which is objectively worse. I have to say that a little too often young fictional boys are targeted for slash art, which makes the gerne even less dignified.

I'd like to know, if these artists like two males kissing and boning that much, why don't they at least make their own characters? Characters who truly are homosexual, instead of taking every male or female cartoon character who happened to hold the hand of the same sex once in a random cartoon episode and assume it's alright for them to alter their sexuality based on 2 seconds of video.
I don't think that homosexuality should be seen as some kind of ultimate porno invention, these boys and girls deserve better. Perhaps an actual love story.
Homosexuals are human beings with their sex lives being the only difference; so WHY is their sex lives considered the only thing of importance to slash artists? As if homosexuals do nothing else but bang each other, show off their tight pink panties, or just being complete whores all day. Just because someone is homosexual, doesn't mean their life is filled with crotch-staring, dramatic fapping while crying over their difficult lives, French kissing in public and ass humping whenever someone bends over. Yet people draw these horrifying images over and over and try to make it look better than it is by calling this junk "cute".

This kind of art is all about artists having something to wank to and I can't take these people seriously when they scold me for being intolerant and homophobic; because me defending homosexuals and telling artists to stop bullshitting around is a clear sign of me being "scurred of those dang-blasted queer folk, ya'll". Am I right.
I don't have the right to say what someone should like, or the power to change someone's interests, but I'd like to indicate everyone about the fact that someone who calls him/herself a true fanartist and yet dares to draw art so out of place, I have to wonder.

Again, can't help yourself drawing homosexual porn? Then design your own (cartoon) characters. Leave Naruto, Death Note, Ed, Edd n Eddy, and South Park alone.

Avatar

If I told you the plot was original, I would be lying.

A modern and upgraded version of Pocahontas is what I saw, and this movie teaches us that guys always get their chicks as long they have the biggest car. Or flying dinosaur-creature-thingy.

Even after miss Nightcrawler ditched her tied up man to die by the army's rockets, he's still interested in getting it on with the girl. But you'll have to realize he wouldn't have gone far if her mother didn't came to save him. And what did he ever do for her? Wasn't your girlfriend, who was just 2 metres away, supposed to save you?
So, she abandoned him and he has to prove himself to her and ALL the other aliens again just to get their attention and to motivate them to fight back. It's incredibly sad a stranger has to tell those creatures what to do; I would have figured out on my own from the beginning I had to get the Hell out of there when I'd see giant bulldozers driving through my forest.
But these blue Lemmings were too busy tying up two people who were trying to help them.

The thought that you can have your own "avatar" created from your DNA and one of the alien's is pretty awesome, though I failed to see the difference between 99% of the characters, just like a white person failing to see the differences between black people. And Asians.
The comment "It looks just like you" is nice to have, but honestly, when the guy in the tank next to it has the same nose and ass, I don't think it's very valid.
This movie has great battle scenes, though.

I'm still struggling with the decision wether to say this movie is overrated or not, since the avatar idea is a nice touch and it has a title to confuse anyone who watches too much Nickelodeon. But like I mentioned at the start, this is "Pocahontas" all over again. And apparently America still never learned about the issue with the Indians; and try to wipe out an entire nature-loving race from their own home land once again.

Charity isn't going to clean your conscience now, American swines.
No further comment.